Legal Opinion

Katz v. Hlavac

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 12, 1902No. Nos. 13,201-(167)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Action in tbe district court for Ramsey county to recover $3,705 upon a bond in claim and delivery proceedings. Tlie case was tried before Brill, J., and a jury, which rendered a verdict in favor of plaintiff for $1,008.59. From an order granting a motion for a new trial, plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Action to recover upon a bond in claim and delivery proceedings, in which plaintiff had a verdict in the court below, and appealed from an order granting a new trial.

The facts are as follows: Defendant Hlavac brought an action in claim and delivery against plaintiff, Katz, to recover a stock of boots and shoes which he claimed to own, in which action he executed and delivered the usual bond, conditioned to prosecute the action with effect and return the property to defendants therein if a return was adjudged by the court, and pay to them such sum as for any cause might be recovered against…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Berthold v. FoxSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1874
  2. Sherman v. ClarkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1877
  3. New England Furniture & Carpet Co. v. BryantSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  4. Moor v. FolsomSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1869
  5. Stewart v. WolfeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. O'Brien v. WhyteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  2. Republic State Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  3. Westbrook State Bank v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API