Legal Opinion

G. A. Le More & Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 16, 1904No. 9650PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The Reporters’ statement of the case: The grounds of the claimants’ motion appear in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtPeedle, J.

The bill proposing an appropriation for the payment of the claim in' this case was referred to the court under the act of March 3, 1887 (1 Supp. R. S.,' 559), by resolution of the United States Senate July 17,1897.

*485The claimants appeared and filed their petition herein, averring in part and in substance that they are citizens of the Republic of France, where they resided during the late civil Avar;

That in April, 1864, the naval forces of the United States seized 830 bales of cotton belonging to them and carried the same to Cairo, Ill.; that said cotton Avas sold by the Government and the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. The Ouachita CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
  2. Spicer v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1869
  3. G. A. Le More & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1899

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rymarkiewicz v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1906
  2. Hartiens v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1906
  3. Markham v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API