Rymarkiewicz v. United States
United States Court of Claims
The Reporters’ statement of the case: The facts on which the motion was founded appear in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBaRNey, J.
The claimant files a motion herein for a new trial on the ground, (1) error of fact, in that the decision of the court is contrary to the evidence, and (2) that it is the claimant’s desire to place before the court newly discovered evidence in support of loyalty.
The claim is for stores and supplies alleged to have been taken in or near Nashville, Tenn., by the United States Army during the war for the suppression of the rebellion. The claim was ref err eel to the court by the Committee on War Claims of the House of Representatives, June 19, 1886, under the provisions of the act of March 3,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Case v. BeauregardSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Hopkins v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
- United States v. O'GradySupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Brown v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
- Eureka Company v. Bailey CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kanehl v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
- First National Steamship Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1946
- Lewis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Hunt v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1910
- Richardson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.