G. A. Le More & Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
On the claimants' Motion. The Reporters' statement of the case: The facts in regard to the motion appear sufficiently in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtPeelle, J.
The question presented for our decision arises on the claimants’ motion to incorporate into and consider as part of the record of this case the transcript of the original evidence from the Supreme Court of the United States in the case of G. A. Le More & Co., appellants, v. The United States, appealed from the district court for the southern district of Illinois, Ouachita Gotton (6 Wall., 521), which transcript is now in the possession of the clerk of this court.
The case before us was referred by resolution of the Senate July II, 1897, under section 14, act of March 3,1887 (24 Stat. L., 505;…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Case v. BeauregardSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Hopkins v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
- The Ouachita CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
- Chapman Ex Rel. Leavitt v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
- United States v. FlandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Rymarkiewicz v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1906
- G. A. Le More & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1904
- Hartiens v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1906
- Richardson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1935
- West Virginia v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1902
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.