Legal Opinion
State v. Tincher
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided April 25, 1988No. CA87-12-029PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Per curiam
This cause came on to be heard upon the appeal from the Court of Common Pleas of Preble County.
The state appeals from an entry of the Court of Common Pleas of Preble County that suppressed physical evidence seized during a search, and oral statements that were the fruit of the seizure, by finding the search was conducted in violation of the Fourth Amendment. At the hearing on the motion to suppress, the following facts giving rise to the search were introduced.
On September 5,1987, defendants-appellees, Tony A. Tincher and Darin K. Palmer, were camping at a campsite in the Hueston Woods State…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. ChadwickSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- State v. KesslerOhio Supreme Court · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Alley v. BettencourtOhio Court of Appeals · 1999
- State v. LemasterOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- State v. MitchellOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
- State v. LenardOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- State v. WhiteOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.