Legal Opinion

Gehman v. Smith

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 18, 1948No. Civil Action No. 7761PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McGRANERY, District Judge.

Plaintiff is seeking an injunction against collection of a federál tax and the government has filed a motion to dismiss. For the purposes of that motion, the facts alleged in plaintiff’s complaint must be taken as true. According to the allegations, plaintiff Marvin L. Gehman, under the trade name of Branch Valley Creamery, operates a second-hand churn on the ground floor of his home at R.D. No. 2, Telford, Montgomery County, Pennsylvania. His weekly earnings are from fifty to seventy-five dollars but he operates his business in a precarious fashion, meeting bank…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Miller v. Standard Nut Margarine Co. of Fla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Sonzinsky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. Lipke v. LedererSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. Allen v. Regents of the University SystemSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Regal Drug Corp. v. WardellSupreme Court of the United States · 1922

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ellis Campbell, Jr., District Director of Internal Revenue v. Gussie L. Davenport, Individually and as Independent of the Estate of F. B. DavenportCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
  2. Morton v. WhiteDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1959
  3. England v. WhiteDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1958
  4. Gehman v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API