Legal Opinion

Gehman v. Smith

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 16, 1952No. Civ. A. 10361PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CLARY, District Judge.

A different aspect of this case was before this Court on another occasion. Certain taxes were assessed against the present plaintiff, an alleged manufacturer of adulterated butter. In the first action he sued to enjoin collection of the taxes. Judge McGranery on February 18, 1948 in an opinion reported at 76 F.Supp. 805, Gehman v. Smith, Collector of Internal Revenue, Civil Action No. 7761, held a tax assessed against a manufacturer of butter adulterated by excessive moisture to be a “tax” and not a “penalty”, and dismissed the complaint. Thereupon, plaintiff paid the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gehman v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1948

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Marvin L. Gehman v. Francis R. Smith, Collector of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API