Legal Opinion

Solomon v. Solomon

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 27, 1953No. Docket Nos. 15332, 15319, 15428Published

[Three consolidated cases.]

1Opinion of the Court

118 Cal.App.2d 149 (1953)

257 P.2d 760

JACOB HAI SOLOMON, Respondent,

v.

RACHEL SOLOMON, Appellant. [Three consolidated cases.]

Docket Nos. 15332, 15319, 15428.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Two.

May 27, 1953.

Henry C. Clausen and Richard G. Burns for Appellant.

Mueller & McLeod and Charles N. Douglas for Respondent.

NOURSE, P.J.

Three appeals are presented in a consolidated record. One is from an order pendente lite of the San Francisco Superior Court awarding plaintiff $250 alimony, $2,000 counsel fees, and $500 for costs. Another is an appeal from a similar order of the San…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Locke Paddon v. Locke PaddonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Gay v. GayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Sewell v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  4. International Ass'n of Cleaning & Dye House Workers v. LandowitzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Sweeley v. SweeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API