Legal Opinion

Danner v. Auto-Owners Insurance

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 2001No. 99-1052PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliam A. Bablitch, J.

¶ 1. Darci, Frederick and Rita Danner (the Danners) brought a bad faith claim against their insurance carrier, Auto-Owners Insurance Co. (Auto-Owners). The bad faith claim arose out of the Danners' efforts to obtain the payment of benefits pursuant to the policy's underinsured motorist clause. A trial was held on the Danners' bad faith claim. The jury issued a verdict that found in favor of the Danners.

¶ 2. On this review, we consider three issues. First, Auto-Owners argues that because of the basic adversarial relationship that exists between an insured and an insurer in an underinsured…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Anderson v. Continental InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Rawlings v. ApodacaArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Management Computer Services, Inc. v. Hawkins, Ash, Baptie & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Hilker v. Western Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Danbeck v. American Family Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Brethorst v. Allstate Property & Casualty InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Seitzinger v. Community Health NetworkWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. BrekkeSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  5. Jones v. Secura InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API