Danner v. Auto-Owners Insurance
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilliam A. Bablitch, J.
¶ 1. Darci, Frederick and Rita Danner (the Danners) brought a bad faith claim against their insurance carrier, Auto-Owners Insurance Co. (Auto-Owners). The bad faith claim arose out of the Danners' efforts to obtain the payment of benefits pursuant to the policy's underinsured motorist clause. A trial was held on the Danners' bad faith claim. The jury issued a verdict that found in favor of the Danners.
¶ 2. On this review, we consider three issues. First, Auto-Owners argues that because of the basic adversarial relationship that exists between an insured and an insurer in an underinsured…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Anderson v. Continental InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- Rawlings v. ApodacaArizona Supreme Court · 1986
- Management Computer Services, Inc. v. Hawkins, Ash, Baptie & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
- Hilker v. Western Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Danbeck v. American Family Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
- Brethorst v. Allstate Property & Casualty InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2011
- Seitzinger v. Community Health NetworkWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. BrekkeSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
- Jones v. Secura InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.