Legal Opinion
Kalinowski v. Yeh
Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals
Decided March 24, 1993No. 15666PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT BY
WATANABE, J.
Plaintiffs Harry and Adelaine Kalinowski (Kalinowskis) brought the instant action, seeking specific performance of a contract to purchase a condominium unit from Defendants Jim and Lisa Yeh (Yehs). The trial court held for the Kalinowskis, and we affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On May 26,1989, the Yehs signed a “Deposit, Receipt, Offer, and Acceptance” (DROA) to purchase a new home under construction in Mililani, Hawaii (Mililani DROA). Closing of the transaction was to take place on August 30, 1989; however, the Yehs’ offer was contingent upon the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Giannini v. First National Bank of Des PlainesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
- Kimm v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- Alk v. LaniniCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
- Pruitt v. GrazianoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
- Hurst v. KukahiHawaii Supreme Court · 1919
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Jeffrey McDonaldCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- Lajayi v. FafiyebiSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2004
- Thompson v. McCannSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2000
- Nelson v. BooneHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
- Furuya v. Association of Apartment Owners of Pacific Monarch, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2016
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.