Legal Opinion
J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Jeffrey McDonald
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided July 25, 2014No. 13-2635PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAMILTON, Circuit Judge.
Businesses often seek to bind customers to arbitration agreements because they view arbitration as more efficient and predictable than going to court. In an unusual role reversal, this case features a large company trying its best to avoid arbitration with two of its former customers. That company, J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, has sued its former investment account holders, Jeffrey and Shelli McDonald, in federal district court to stop them from arbitrating a dispute against an affiliate of the Bank and two Bank employees, but not against the Bank.
The district court…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Atlantic Marine Constr. Co. v. United States Dist. Court for Western Dist. of Tex.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
- MedImmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. ShuteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Sprint Communications Co. v. APCC Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Matt Dinerstein v. Google, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2023
- Smith v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015
- Kristin Perry v. Dennis HollingsworthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Government Employees Insurance v. KornDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2015
- Aboloma, Osita v. Vembu, RajanDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2020
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.