Legal Opinion
Harbin v. Sams
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided June 20, 1984No. 68070PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Sognier, Judge.
Harbin instituted garnishment proceedings against her motor vehicle insurer, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm), seeking to collect funds allegedly due her by virtue of her insurance policy. Harbin was injured in an accident that occurred while she was riding as a passenger in her own vehicle driven by Richard L. Kirkland, who was killed as a result of the accident and whose estate was named as defendant in the garnishment action. Harbin executed a release and settlement with Kirkland’s insurer, Aetna Life & Casualty Company, in consideration of the sum…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Varnadoe v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
- Morris v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
- Shaw v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- Keene v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Lauer v. BodnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
3Cited by9 opinions
- Cotton States Mutual Insurance v. NeeseSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
- Geico v. DickeySupreme Court of Georgia · 1986
- Southern Guaranty Insurance v. Preferred Risk Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1987
- Clabo v. Tennessee Farmers Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
- Preferred Risk Mutual Insurance v. Southern Guaranty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.