Legal Opinion

Morris v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 18, 1953No. 34704PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEelton, J.

1. In addition to the policy provisions contained in the statement of facts, the policy also provided: “Definition of Insured. With respect to the insurance for bodily injury liability, for property damage liability and for medical 'payments the unqualified word 'insured’ includes the named insured and also includes any person while using the automobile and any person or organization legally responsible for the use thereof, provided the actual use of the automobile is by the named insured or with his permission.” The first question to be decided is, whether the exception stated in the policy…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Forlaw v. Augusta Naval Stores Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. Pearson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  3. Cartier v. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1931

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. United Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. HanleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Varnadoe v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  3. Buddin v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1967
  4. Faraj v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1984
  5. James W. Zipperer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API