Legal Opinion

Childress v. Brooks

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 26, 1924No. 8545PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.

Appellees agree that appellants make a correct statement of the nature and result of the suit as follows: ■

“On February 23, 1923, R. E. Brooks sued J. C. Boyd, W. R. Wells, J. M. Boyd, P. L. Childress, W. W. Childress and the Board of Regents of the University of Texas in the district court of Harris county, alleging: (a) That J. C. Boyd was a resident of Tarrant county, Tex., the other individual defendants residents of Crockett county, Tex., and that the Board of Regents was comprised of Lutcher Stark of Orange county, Tex., and others whose names are not given; (b) that the two Boyds and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cobb v. BarberTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. StevensTexas Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Holcomb v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  4. Waxahachie Nat. Bank v. Sigmond Rothschild Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  5. Scott v. Cassidy Southwestern Commission Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1922

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Oakland Motor Car Co. v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  2. Eppenauer v. SchrupCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  3. Harris v. WillsonTexas Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Bennett v. LangdeauTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Brader v. EllinghausenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API