Legal Opinion

Tartaglia v. McLaughlin

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1947PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinbrink, J.

Petitioners seek an order- to' compel the respondents,. as Justice and Clerk of the Municipal Court of the City of New York, to issue a warrant for the eviction of the tenant Kelly. Cress motion to dismiss as to. the respondent Winter is granted on consent and his name , is stricken from the proceeding. The remaining. respondents are represented by the Attorney-General of the State, of New York, and-the Corporation Counsel-of the City,of New York, and, by. arrangement. between them, the latter presented the argument on their behalf.-.," . ...

There is no dispute as to Jhe-essential feets.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Block v. HirshSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. People Ex Rel. Durham Realty Corp. v. La FetraNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
  3. Adler v. DeeganNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  4. S. H. Kress & Co. v. Department of HealthNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  5. Jewish Consumptives' Relief Society v. Town of WoodburyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. F. T. B. Realty Corp. v. GoodmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
  2. Fifth Avenue Office Center Co. v. City of Mount VernonNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Molnar v. CurtinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
  4. People v. KearseSyracuse City Court · 1968
  5. Tartaglia v. McLaughlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API