John Doe 76C v. Archdiocese of St. Paul & Minneapolis

OPINION

SCHELLHAS, Judge.

Appellant challenges the district court’s summary-judgment ruling that his tort and fraud claims arising out of alleged childhood sexual abuse are time-barred. Because we conclude that there are genuine issues of material fact relating to (1) whether appellant had a disability that *205tolled the tort limitations period and (2) when appellant’s fraud claims accrued, we reverse and remand.

FACTS

On April 24 and May 9, 2006, appellant John Doe 76C commenced suit against respondents Archdiocese of St. Paul and Minneapolis and Diocese of Winona, alleging that a priest, whom…