Legal Opinion

In re Coloplast Corp. Pelvic Support Systems Products Liability Litigation

District Court, S.D. West Virginia

Decided November 29, 2016No. Civil Action No. 2:13-cv-17578; MDL NO. 2387PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER

JOSEPH R. GOODWIN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

It is ORDERED that the court’s November 18, 2016, Memorandum Opinion & Order [ECF No. 17] is amended for minor typographical changes.

*578Pending before the court is Coloplast Corp.’s Motion to Dismiss on the Pleadings [ECF No. 11]. The plaintiffs responded [ECF No. 15] and Coloplast Corp. replied [ECF No. 16] making the Motion ripe for adjudication. For the reasons set forth below, the Motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.

I. Background

This case resides in one of seven MDLs assigned to me by the Judicial Panel…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Giarratano v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008
  4. Cuomo v. Clearing House Ass'n, LLCSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. EXECUTIVE RISK INDEMNITY, INC. v. Charleston Area Medical Center, Inc.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2009

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. HAITH v. HARFORD MUTUAL INSURANCE GROUP, INC.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2023
  2. Proffitt v. Bristol-Myers Squibb CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API