Legal Opinion

Wall v. Stinson

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided July 23, 1999No. S-7667PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRYNER, Justice.

We grant full faith and credit to another state’s judgment only if the issuing court had jurisdiction over the parties and the subject in controversy. But when jurisdiction has been fully litigated in the issuing court, we must credit that court’s jurisdictional decision. Alaskan Robert B. Wall appeared in court in Oregon and contested Oregon’s jurisdiction over his person and over the subject matter of his child support action. The court decided that it had jurisdiction and entered a child support judgment against Wall. Wall abandoned his appeal. He later attacked the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Stoll v. GottliebSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Baldwin v. Iowa State Traveling Men's Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. Sherrer v. SherrerSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Fauntleroy v. LumSupreme Court of the United States · 1908

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Brandon v. Corrections Corp. of AmericaAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State, Child Support Enforcement Division v. BromleyAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Bode v. Minnesota Department of Natural ResourcesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  4. McDonald v. TrihubAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Howard v. SandovalNevada Supreme Court · 2010

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API