Legal Opinion
Matter of Guardianship of Huesman
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided February 11, 1986No. CX-85-1580PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NIERENGARTEN, Judge.
Appellants Robert and Gary Huesman appeal from a judgment that awarded respondent Zenas Baer a $25,678 lien against their farm. Appellants contend that the trial court erred in determining that the farm is not their homestead. We affirm as modified.
FACTS
The Huesman brothers first hired attorney Zenas Baer to prosecute their claim to a 190 acre farm of their mother, Francis Sadie Huesman. Her guardian sought to have the farm sold to pay for her care but the Huesman brothers claimed that she had orally agreed to give them the farm if they moved to the farm and worked…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Denzer v. PrendergastSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- O'Brien v. KrenzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- Ploog v. OgilvieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Northwestern National Bank of South St. Paul v. KrollSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Title Insurance Co. of Minnesota v. Agora Leases, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re Steven L. Peterson and Judith A. Peterson, Debtors. Mark C. Halverson, Panel Trustee v. Steven L. Peterson and Judith A. PetersonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- In Re Quentin B. Stenzel, Debtor. Peoples' State Bank of Wells v. Quentin B. StenzelCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
- In Re SmoinikarUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1996
- In Re EhrichUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1990
- Christensen Law Office, PLLC v. OleanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2018
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.