Legal Opinion

United States v. Dow

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided January 9, 1976No. 29,861PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Two issues are presented by this appeal. The first concerns accused’s counsel. As in United States v. Blakey, 1 M.J. 247 decided this date, we perceive no error in the trial judge’s advice to the accused regarding his right to counsel, and we discern no basis for a conclusion that the accused was denied effective representation because his civilian lawyer and appointed defense counsel also represented co-accused.

Regarding the second assignment of error, in his post-trial review the staff judge advocate recommended that suspension of the period of confinement adjudged at…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. KellerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
  2. United States v. BlakeyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. NewcombUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API