United States v. Newcomb
United States Court of Military Appeals
1ConcurrenceCook, Judge
I agree with Judge Perry, but as he does not meet the issues tendered in Chief Judge Fletcher’s dissent, I am constrained to do so because they are important to military practice.
Chief Judge Fletcher’s pronouncement that the President’s rule-making authority is confined “to matters of trial procedure” and that he has no power in regard to the “procedural steps necessary to bring a case to trial” is contrary to 200 years of American military practice. It not only wipes out the rules prescribed by the President in the Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, 1969 (Revised edition), for…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ex Parte ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Swaim v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- United States v. NixUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1965
- United States v. KellerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
- United States v. KirschUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.