Legal Opinion
Mead v. United States
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided August 28, 2025No. 3:24-cv-01399Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON ANGELINE MEAD, Case No.: 3:24-cv-01399-AN Plaintiff, v. OPINION AND ORDER UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. Plaintiff Angeline Mead brings this action against defendant United States of America, alleging claims of battery, intentional infliction of emotional distress ("IIED"), and negligence under the Federal Torts Claim Act ("FTCA"),
28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b), 2671 et seq. Plaintiff alleges that defendant committed these torts when a federal officer shot her with an impact munition while she attended a protest in July of 2020. On…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Retail Property Trust v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- McGanty v. StaudenrausOregon Supreme Court · 1995
- Sheets v. KnightOregon Supreme Court · 1989
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.