Legal Opinion
Joseph v. Farnsworth Radio & Television Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided June 30, 1952No. 22310_1PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Per curiam
The order is affirmed on the opinion below, D.C., 99 F.Supp. 701, and the subsequent decision in Birnbaum v. Newport Steel Corp., 2 Cir., 193 F.2d 461 wherein we concluded “that Rule X-10B-5 extended protection only to the defrauded purchaser or seller”, 193 F.2d page 464.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Birnbaum v. Newport Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- Joseph v. Farnsworth Radio & Television Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1951
3Cited by45 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,714 Edwin J. Herpich v. Robert H. Wallace, Jack E. LoveCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- List v. Fashion Park, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
- Mutual Shares Corporation, Spingarn Heine & Co., and Norte & Co. v. Genesco, Inc., and W. Maxey JarmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,496 Richard J. Sargent v. Genesco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Trussell v. United Underwriters, Ltd.District Court, D. Colorado · 1964
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.