Legal Opinion
State v. Hendrix
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided June 19, 1991No. C89-12-36913; CA A65065PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.
Defendant and three codefendants were charged in the same indictment with assault in the fourth degree, ORS 163.160(l)(a), and with intimidation in the first degree. ORS 166.165(l)(a)(A). He and one codefendant waived jury trial and tried their cases to the court; the other codefendants tried their cases to a jury. All were convicted. On appeal, defendant challenges only his conviction under ORS 166.165(l)(a)(A), which is commonly referred to as the Intimidation Law. He claims that the evidence was insufficient to convict him and that ORS 166.165(l)(a)(A) is unconstitutional on its face and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Texas v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Lanzetta v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1990
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. PlowmanOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- People v. Joshua H.California Court of Appeal · 1993
- State v. BranchCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- First Nat'l Bank of Anthony v. DunningCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1993
- State v. HendrixOregon Supreme Court · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.