Legal Opinion

State v. Hendrix

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 27, 1992No. CC C89-12-36913; CA A65065; SC S38384PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraber, J.

Defendant was convicted of intimidation in the first degree, ORS lGG.IGSCIXaXA). He challenges his conviction on the grounds that the evidence was insufficient to convict him and that the statute' is unconstitutional. The Court of Appeals affirmed, State v. Hendrix, 107 Or App 734, 813 P2d 1115 (1991), and we also affirm.

ORS 166.165(l)(a)(A) provides:

“Two or more persons acting together commit the crime of intimidation in the first degree, if the persons:
“(a)(A) Intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly cause physical injury to another because of their perception of that person’s race, color,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. MontezOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. WilliamsOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. PlowmanOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. HarrisOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State v. HendrixCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. ShunesonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  2. State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  3. State v. FrostCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  4. State v. FrostCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API