Zurback Steel Corp. v. Edgcomb
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtKing, J.
The issue before this court is whether the trial court properly granted a motion to dismiss the defendant’s cross-claim against the plaintiff because at the time the cross-claim was filed it was barred by the statute of limitations, RSA 508:4. We hold that the dismissal was proper.
In August of 1970, the defendant, Robert Edgcomb, allegedly entered into an oral agreement with the plaintiff, Zurback Steel Corporation, whereby the defendant was to perform services for the plaintiff as an independent contractor in the steel industry. The defendant was to be paid by the plaintiff on a commission…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Jones v. MortimerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Davenport v. HubbardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1873
- National Bank & Trust Company v. CastleSupreme Court of Virginia · 1955
- Johnson v. White Mountain Creamery Ass'nSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1895
- Lovejoy v. AshworthSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1946
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bailey v. SommovigoSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
- Bezanson v. Hampshire Meadows Development Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
- Lago & Sons Dairy, Inc. v. H.P. Hood, Inc.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1995
- Gaucher v. Cold Springs RV Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
- Dunaisky v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.