Legal Opinion
Lovejoy v. Ashworth
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided January 2, 1946No. 3560PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJohnston, J.
No facts are alleged by the defendant which show that the New York court did not have jurisdiction of the parties and the subject matter of the suit in that state. Any alleged facts of fraud in obtaining the judgment of that court could have been litigated in the original action. “The judgment upon which the action is brought, and upon which the plaintiff relies if the court where the judgment was rendered had jurisdiction, is conclusive between the parties, and cannot be reversed, set aside or impeached, for fraud in obtaining it, in this suit.” McDonald v. Drew, 64 N. H. 547.
Accordingly it…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Metcalf v. GilmoreSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1884
- Arcadia Knitting Mills, Inc. v. Elliott Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1937
- Moylan v. LamotheSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1943
- Copeland v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1933
- Vernon Parts Corp. v. Granite State MacHine Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1945
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Braxton v. LitchalkMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
- Angus v. Wald (In Re Wald)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 1997
- Zurback Steel Corp. v. EdgcombSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
- Christian Camps & Conferences, Inc. v. Town of AltonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
- Welch v. ColemanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1949
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.