Texfi Industries, Inc. v. City of Fayetteville
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRITT, Justice.
The question of plaintiff’s standing to sue is not before us inasmuch as we denied defendants’ petition for discretionary review of the holding of the Court of Appeals that plaintiff had such standing. We now agree with the Court of Appeals with respect to its holding on the questions of due process and equal *4protection of the law; therefore, we affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals.
The issue of standing having been resolved in plaintiffs favor we turn now to a brief overview of the substantive law as it relates to the question of annexation.
The 1957 Session of the…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by77 opinions
- Rhyne v. K-Mart Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
- Stephenson v. BartlettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
- White v. PateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- Alford v. ShawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
- Creek Pointe Homeowner's Ass'n v. HappCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.