Legal Opinion

Culver v. Ace Electric

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided February 23, 1998No. 96CA1759PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge PIERCE. *

In this workers’ compensation case, Leonard 0. Culver (claimant) seeks review of a final order of the Industrial Claim Appeals Office (Panel) which granted his employer, Ace Electric; its insurer, the Colorado Compensation Insurance Authority (CCIA); and the Subsequent Injury Fund (SIF) an offset for social security retirement benefits he received. Claimant also contends that the statute authorizing the offset, § 8-42-103(l)(c)(II), C.R.S.1997, violates the equal protection guarantees of the Fourteenth Amendment and Colo. Const, art. II, § 25. In a cross-appeal, the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Kirk v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
  2. Duran v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  3. Industrial Claim Appeals Office v. RomeroSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  4. City & County of Denver v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  5. Christie v. Coors Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1997

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Culver v. Ace ElectricSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  2. Leprino Foods Co. v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. People v. JohnsonColorado Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Lot Thirty-Four Venture, L.L.C. v. Town of TellurideColorado Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Waddell v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API