Legal Opinion

Duncan v. Bruce

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1943PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRubenstein, J.

In an action between alleged partners of a luncheonette and restaurant, the complaint contains two causes of action. The first is to recover damages in the sum of $5,000 representing the plaintiff’s share of the business, including good will, trade and value of merchandise and fixtures destroyed and converted by the defendant, together with an additional $5,000 for damages for loss of profits, it being asserted that the defendant maliciously wrecked, tore, broke and ripped apart the walls, furniture and other fixtures of the partnership business, and carried away and converted the same to his…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Arnold v. . ArnoldNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  2. Dalury v. RezinasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
  3. Dalury v. . RezinasNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  4. Herrick v. GuildAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
  5. Burnstine v. GeistAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dalton v. AustinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  2. Curley v. Brignoli Curley & Roberts AssociatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
  3. Blattberg v. WeissNew York Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Berkule v. FeldmanNew York Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Smith v. Manchester Management Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API