Legal Opinion

Burnstine v. Geist

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 27, 1939PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCohn, J.

Appellant and respondent had been partners in a law firm. After the partnership was dissolved respondent instituted in Queens county an action against appellant for an accounting and for a formal dissolution of the partnership enterprise. In that action this appellant, who was there the defendant, counterclaimed and prayed for an accounting of the partnership affairs up to the time of his exclusion, but asserted no claim for wrongful dissolution of the partnership.

The present action was later instituted by appellant in New York county to recover of respondent damages for breach of the *793contract…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Karrick v. HannamanSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Bagley v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1853
  3. Hyer v. Richmond Traction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. Crownshield Trading Corp. v. EarleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  5. Manny v. BurkeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Notch View Associates v. SmithNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
  2. Napoli v. DomnitchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
  3. Pemberton v. Ladue Realty & Construction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1944
  4. Duncan v. BruceNew York Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Snow v. AdamsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1965

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API