Qualcomm, Inc. v. Motorola, Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING QUALCOMM’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
JONES, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on motion by Plaintiff Qualcomm for partial summary judgment on the issue of the liability of Defendants Motorola and Safeco Insurance Company of America on the temporary restraining order (“TRO”) bond. The Court has received and considered Qualcomm’s motion. Motorola’s opposition, Safeco’s joinder to Motorola’s opposition, and Qualcomm’s reply. Pursuant to Local Rule 7 1, the Court found the matter suitable for disposition without oral argument, notified the parties, and took…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Sierra On-Line, Inc. v. Phoenix Software, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Nintendo of America, Inc. v. Lewis Galoob Toys, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- U.S. D.I.D. Corp. v. Windstream Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
- United States v. GuessDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2005
- INDIVIOR INC. v. ALVOGEN PINE BROOK, INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
- INDIVIOR INC. v. DR. REDDY'S LABORATORIES S.A.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
- Konecranes Global Corporation v. Mode Tech (Beijing) Co. Ltd.District Court, D. Nevada · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.