Legal Opinion
Konecranes Global Corporation v. Mode Tech (Beijing) Co. Ltd.
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided March 24, 2020No. 2:18-cv-02015Unknown
1Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 KONECRANES GLOBAL CORPORATION, ) 4 ) Plaintiff, ) Case No.: 2:18-cv-02015-GMN-NJK 5 vs. ) ) ORDER 6 MODE TECH (BEIJING) CO., LTD., ) 7 ) Defendant. ) 8 ) 9 Pending before the Court is Defendant Mode Tech (Beijing) Co., Ltd.’s (“Defendant’s”) 10 Motion for Sanctions Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11, (ECF No. 50). Plaintiff 11 Konecranes Global Corporation (“Plaintiff”) filed a Response, (ECF No. 54), and Defendant 12 filed a Reply, (ECF No. 55). Also pending before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Recover 13 Damages in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Holgate v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Nintendo of America, Inc. v. Lewis Galoob Toys, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- View Engineering, Inc. v. Robotic Vision Systems, Inc., and Morrison Law FirmCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Turner v. Sungard Business Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
- Intamin, Ltd. v. Magnetar Technologies, Corp. [Corrected Cover Sheet on 04/26/07]Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.