Legal Opinion

Masonek v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

District Court, C.D. California

Decided January 31, 2012No. SACV 09-1048 DOC (RNBx); Case No. SACV 10-2145 DOC (RNBx)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO DISMISS

DAVID 0. CARTER, District Judge.

Before the Court are nine motions to dismiss filed by seven third-party broker dealer defendants (“BD Defendants”) seeking to dismiss the third-party complaints filed by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”) and the Bank of New York Mellon (“BNYM”) (collectively, the “Banks”). These motions are as follows: Cullum & Burks Securities, Inc.’s (“Cullum & Burks”) Motion to Dismiss Wells Fargo’s Third-Party Complaint (Docket 255); Cullum & Burks’ Motion to Dismiss *1210BYNM’s Amended Third-Party Complaint (Docket 256); National Securities…

2Cases cited24 opinions

Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
Parks School of Business, Inc., Dba Parks College, a New Mexico Corporation v. Fife Symington Roy A. Nicholson Sally HeinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

Encuentra v. Church & Dwight Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2024