Legal Opinion

United States ex rel. Garbe v. Kmart Corp.

District Court, S.D. Illinois

Decided September 18, 2013No. Case No. 12-CV-0881-MJR-PMFPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

REAGAN, District Judge:

Pending before the Court is Defendant Kmart Corporation’s Motion to Dismiss Relator’s Complaint for failure to state a claim (Doc. 102). In the motion, Defendant Kmart Corporation (“Kmart”) seeks to dismiss all 32 counts of the Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”), pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1), 12(b)(6) and 9(b). Plaintiff-Relator James Garbe has filed a brief in opposition (Doc. 106). For the reasons set forth below, this motion is DENIED.

Relator has brought qui tam1 claims on behalf of the United States under the False Claims…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States ex rel. Garbe v. Kmart Corp.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2015
  2. STURGEON v. PHARMERICA CORPORATIONDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
  3. United States of America v. Fresenius Vascular Care, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API