Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Alix

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided October 25, 2017No. 16–P–1416Published

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant, Pedro Duran Alix, appeals from an order denying his motion for new trial in which he argued that counsel, who represented him on a motion to suppress (suppression counsel),2 was ineffective because he did not sufficiently investigate the allegations in an officer's affidavit in support of a search warrant. We affirm.

Background. The underlying search warrant and accompanying affidavit sought authorization to search the defendant's residence for evidence of heroin distribution. The affidavit was executed by a Salem police detective with substantial experience and training in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Commonwealth v. SaferianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  3. Commonwealth v. LugoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  4. Breese v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
  5. Commonwealth v. DuranMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API