Legal Opinion

Breese v. Commonwealth

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 13, 1993PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAbrams, J.

A single justice of this court allowed a motion of Glen J. Breese (defendant) for leave to appeal, see Leaster v. Commonwealth, 385 Mass. 547 (1982); G. L. c. 278, § 33E (1990 ed.), a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. The defendant was convicted of murder in the first degree. We affirmed the conviction. See Commonwealth v. Breese, 381 Mass. 13 (1980). Leave to appeal a second motion for new trial was allowed and the defendant’s conviction was affirmed. See Commonwealth v. Breese, 389 Mass. 540 (1983). The appeal now before us claims that counsel on the second appeal was ineffective…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Ross v. MoffittSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Commonwealth v. SaferianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  5. Orozco v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RandolphMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  2. Commonwealth v. CoonanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
  3. Commonwealth v. SouzaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  4. Commonwealth v. OrtegaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
  5. Commonwealth v. ConkeyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API