Commonwealth v. Lugo
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtGreaney, J.
A jury in the Superior Court convicted the defendant of distributing heroin. The only evidence concerning the defendant’s alleged activities came from Sergeant Walter Soriano of the Lawrence police department who testified that, while at an undisclosed location, he had observed the defendant selling drugs in a parking lot. In the initial appeal, the Appeals Court considered the correctness of a pretrial ruling by the judge that allowed the Commonwealth’s motion in limine to prohibit the defendant’s counsel from questioning Soriano on the exact location from which he made his observations. See…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- McCray v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Scher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- State v. BurnettSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
- United States v. Gary Barrett GreenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ConnollyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
- Commonwealth v. AmralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
- Commonwealth v. SnyderMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
- Commonwealth v. BakoianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
- Commonwealth v. HernandezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.