Matter of Hey
West Virginia Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
McHUGH, Chief Justice:
The West Virginia Judicial Hearing Board, after a full hearing, found that John Hey, Judge of the Thirteenth Judicial Circuit, violated Canon 3A(6) of the Judicial Code of Ethics [1976] and recommended that Judge Hey be publicly censured and be required to pay the costs of the proceedings. Although the Board exceeded its authority by rendering a finding that Judge Hey’s actions occurred outside the course of his official duties, we conclude that the adoption of this finding is not necessary to determine that Judge Hey violated Canon 3A(6). After an independent evaluation…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Forrester v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Papa v. New Haven Federation of TeachersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- James M. Scott, Jr. v. Robert C. FlowersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Matter of SheffieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
- West Virginia Judicial Inquiry Commission v. DostertWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1980
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Matter of HeyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1994
- Matter of BrowningWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1994
- In Re Complaint Against WhiteNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
- In Re the Inquiry of BroadbeltSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
- Roush v. HeyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.