Legal Opinion

Roush v. Hey

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1996No. 22958PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RECHT, Justice:

This case requires us to decide whether a circuit court judge has absolute immunity for remarks made on a national television program relating to the facts and personalities of a case in which the judge was involved. The Circuit Court of Kanawha County granted summary judgment in favor of the circuit court judge, holding that the judge was absolutely immune from any claims for damages for remarks which formed the defamation and false light claims filed against the judge.

We conclude that the judge’s remarks made while appearing on a national television program were not “judicial…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Forrester v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Bradley v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  5. Painter v. PeavyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Parkulo v. West Virginia Board of Probation & ParoleWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Bell v. United States Department of the TreasuryDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2025
  3. Christina Vogt v. American Arbitration AssociationWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Jane Doe v. Samuel D. Parsons, in his individual capacity, acting under color of state law as a Fayette County Magistrate, and MX. DOE(S), individuals sued in their individual capacity, whose identity is presently unknown, gender neutralDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2026
  5. Michael J. Kanode Sr. v. Hon. Derek C. Swope, JudgeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2013

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API