Legal Opinion

In Re the Inquiry of Broadbelt

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided October 10, 1996PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal concerns whether a sitting municipal court judge may appear on television to comment on cases pending in other jurisdictions. After the matter was referred to the Advisory Committee on Extrajudicial Activities, the Committee issued Opinion No. 13-95, which disapproved of Judge Broadbelt’s appearances on “Court TV” and “Geraldo Live” as a commentator. We granted review, 142 N.J. 443, 663 A.2d 1352 (1995).

I

The facts are undisputed. Petitioner, Evan W. Broadbelt, has been a municipal court judge since 1982 and serves five municipalities in Monmouth and Ocean counties. A…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Graham v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Gentile v. State Bar of Nev.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Barone v. Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  5. Papa v. New Haven Federation of TeachersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Broadman v. Commission on Judical PerformanceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. In Re MathesiusSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2006
  3. In Re Complaint Against WhiteNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Butler v. Alabama Judicial Inquiry CommissionDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2000
  5. In re Advisory Letter No. 3-11Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2013

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API