Legal Opinion

Jarosiewicz v. Conlisk

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided June 29, 1973No. 73 C 1010PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*122MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

BAUER, District Judge.

This cause comes on the defendants Conlisk and Mueller’s motion for summary judgment.

This is a civil rights action to redress an alleged deprivation of the plaintiff’s civil rights guaranteed by the Civil Rights Act of 1871, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985 and 1986. Jurisdiction of this Court is based on 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1343,'and 42 U.S.C. § 1988.

The plaintiff, Walter Jarosiewicz, is alleged to be a “person within the jurisdiction of the United States and a resident of Chicago, Illinois”. The defendants are: Thomas Peebles, a Chicago police…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Sanberg v. DaleyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1969
  2. Jordan v. KellyDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1963
  3. Barrows v. FaulknerDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1971
  4. Carson v. Burlington Northern Inc.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1971
  5. Patrum v. MartinDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1968

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Colonial Times, Inc., D.B.A. The Daily Rag v. Honorable Oliver Gasch, United States District JudgeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
  2. Roberts v. Homelite Division of Textron, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1986
  3. Perry v. Mohawk Rubber Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1974
  4. Padover v. Gimbel Bros., Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Lucas v. CurranDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1974

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API