Legal Opinion
Peck v. Shell Oil Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 15, 1944No. 10280PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHENS, Circuit Judge.
In an action upon a contract, brought in the District Court on the ground of diversity of citizenship of the parties, judgment was entered for defendants. Plaintiffs appeal.
On April 8, 1938, plaintiff-appellants, Peck and Ruddle, entered into a “license agreement” with Shell Oil Company, predecessor of appellant Shell Oil Company, Incorporated. (Both companies are hereinafter referred to as Shell.) Therein Peck and Ruddle warranted that they owned all rights “to a new and useful core binding composition hereinafter referred to as ‘Core-Min-Oil/ consisting of two…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Liquid Veneer Corporation v. SmucklerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
- Forno v. CoyleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
- Paramount Productions, Inc. v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
- Moore v. TremellingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
3Cited by13 opinions
- Richard S. Simpson v. Union Oil Company of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Perma Research & Development Co. v. Singer Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1975
- Joseph v. Donover Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
- Monte Carlo Shirt, Inc. v. Daewoo International (America) Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Everest & Jennings, Inc. v. E & J Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.