Legal Opinion
Everest & Jennings, Inc. v. E & J Manufacturing Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 24, 1958No. 15922PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JERTBERG, Circuit Judge.'
There are cross appeals before us in this case. Everest & Jennings, Inc., a corporation — defendant below and appellant and cross-appellee here — appealed from the judgment of the court below holding that E & J Manufacturing Company, a corporation — plaintiff below and appellee and cross-appellant here — was the owner of the trade-mark “E & J”; that the trade-mark was good and valid in law; and was infringed by the use of the trade-mark “E-J”. The court enjoined the defendant from further infringement, and refused to order registration of “E-J” as a trade-mark of the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Armstrong Paint & Varnish Works v. Nu-Enamel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Champion Spark Plug Co. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Stork Restaurant, Inc. v. SahatiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
- Luckett v. Delpark, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Herring-Hall-Marvin Safe Co. v. Hall's Safe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Union Carbide Corporation v. Ever-Ready Incorporated, a Corporation, and Mark Gilbert, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
- James Burrough Limited and Kobrand Corporation v. Sign of the Beefeater, Inc., and Montgomery Ward & Co., IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
- United States Jaycees v. Philadelphia JayceesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Hmh Publishing Co., Inc., a Delaware Corporation, and Playboy Clubs International, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Victor BrincatCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Carl Zeiss Stiftung v. VEB Carl Zeiss JenaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.