Boston Retirement Board v. McCormick
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtCutter, J.
The board seeks declaratory relief. The parties have agreed that the facts alleged in the bill are all the material facts and that inferences may be drawn as if the bill were a case stated. The case has been reported without decision. Mrs. McCormick became a thirty-hour-a-week floor-duty nurse in the Boston hospital department and a member of the Boston retirement system, effective June 2,1954. See G. L. c. 32, §§ 1-28; St. 1947, c. 520. She received, through exposure to tuberculosis bacilli in the course of her employment during July and August, 1955, an injury compensable under the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Reggio v. WarrenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
- Gannon v. Contributory Retirement Appeal BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
- Piea Realty Co. Inc. v. PapuzynskiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
- Cogan v. Cambridge Retirement SystemMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- Finer v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956
3Cited by20 opinions
- Opinion of the JusticesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
- Namay v. Contributory Retirement Appeal BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
- Bulger v. Contributory Retirement Appeal BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
- State Board of Retirement v. Boston Retirement BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
- Bianchi v. Retirement BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.