Legal Opinion
Bosse v. City of Hornell
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 1, 1993PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted *894defendant’s motion for summary judgment because plaintiff was not a person "employed” to carry out work within the purview of Labor Law § 240 (1) and § 241 (6) (see, Gibson v Worthington Div. of McGraw-Edison Co., 78 NY2d 1108; Chabot v Baer, 55 NY2d 844, affg 82 AD2d 928; Groger v Morrison-Knudsen Co., 184 AD2d 620; Malczewski v Cannon Design, 125 AD2d 941). The record establishes that plaintiff’s employer was hired to perform inspection work on the bridge on behalf of the State of New York and was not…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- DaBolt v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Gibson v. Worthington Division of McGraw-Edison Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Mosher v. St. Joseph's VillaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Malczewski v. Cannon Design, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Chabot v. BaerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Nelson v. Sweet Associates, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Astrakan v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- Chapman v. IBM Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Bogenrieder v. Crippen Heating & Air ConditioningAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Bogenrieder v. Crippen Heating & Air ConditioningAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999