Legal Opinion
Gibson v. Worthington Division of McGraw-Edison Co.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided November 25, 1991PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the second cause of action granted.
Having sustained some damage to the roof of one of its buildings, defendant sought repair estimates from several contractors, including Edward M. Ziegler Co., plaintiffs employer. Plaintiff, a design engineer who had defendant as one of his accounts, went to defendant’s building for the purpose of inspecting the damage. While he was being shown the damaged area by defendant’s maintenance supervisor,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Mordkofsky v. V.C.V. Development Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Chabot v. BaerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Chabot v. BaerNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
3Cited by61 opinions
- Martinez v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
- Campisiv. Epos Contracting Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Agli v. Turner Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Lawyer v. Rotterdam Ventures, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Shields v. St. Marks Housing Associates, L.P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.