Legal Opinion

McCubbin v. Buss

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 1966No. 36124PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Plaintiff sued for rescission of an agreement which allegedly had been induced by business coercion. On this appeal from an adverse judgment he contends that the evidence establishes business coercion and that he effectively exercised his power to avoid the transaction,.

The parties to the agreement, which discharged a prior stock-purchase contract, included defendant Goodrich Dairy, Inc., a close corporation, and its stockholders who were parties to the prior contract. Those stockholders may be conveniently limited to defendant Harold H. Buss and plaintiff, the evidence permitting us to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Russo v. WilliamsNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
  2. First National Bank v. SargeantNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Fitzgerald ex rel. Stockholders of the Fitzgerald & Mallory Construction Co. v. Fitzgerald & Mallory Construction Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Silsbee v. WebberMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
  5. Carpenter Paper Co. v. Kearney Hub Publishing Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. National Auto Brokers Corp. v. Aleeda Development Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Bauermeister v. McReynoldsNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  3. First Data Resources, Inc. v. Omaha Steaks International, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Richards v. Allianz Life Insurance Co. of North AmericaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Lincoln Benefit Life Co. v. EdwardsDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API