First National Bank v. Sargeant
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error from the district court for Butler county. Tried below before Sornborger, J.
1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.
An action was brought in the lower court by the plaintiff, -who is now the defendant in error, against the defendant, plaintiff in error, to recover a sum of money alleged to have been paid under compulsion and duress. The trial resulted in a verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiff for the sum of $640. The defendant prosecutes error.
The petition in error contains 112 assignments of error. With the thermometer registering well up to the same mark, we can scarcely be expected to note and consider each assignment at length, and in detail. If we generalize in our treatment and discussion…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Radich v. HutchinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Brumagim v. TillinghastCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
- Brown v. PierceSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- United States v. HuckabeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Central Bank v. CopelandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1862
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Koy v. SchneiderTexas Supreme Court · 1920
- Koy v. SchneiderTexas Supreme Court · 1920
- Ward v. ScarboroughTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
- Centric Corp. v. Morrison-Knudsen Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
- Kelso v. CookIndiana Supreme Court · 1916
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.