Prussia v. Bailey
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Shiawassee; Miner, J. Assumpsit by Franklin O. Prussia against Orla Bailey and another on a promissory note. Judgment for defendants. Plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtStone, C. J.
This is an action of assumpsit, the declaration being upon the common counts, to which was attached under the usual notice a copy of a promissory note reading as follows:
“500.00 'Detroit, Mich., June 1, 1910.
“Seven months after date we promise to pay to Ruth E. Benjamin or order five hundred dollars at-, value received, with 5 per cent, interest per annum from above date.
“Orla Bailey,
“Robert Bailey.”
Indorsed on back of note the following:. “Ruth E. Benjamin, May 5, 1911, received interest on this note to date.
“Franklin O. Prussia.”
Under the plea of the general issue the defendants gave notice…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Neal v. NealMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
3Cited by1 opinion
- Detroit Life Insurance v. LinsenmierMichigan Supreme Court · 1928